
Did you happen to see my post on IG and FB of this sketch done at…Stonehenge? Our Oxford workshop group in July tackled sketching in both Bath and Stonehenge in one day, which meant that by the time we got here, we only had 15 minutes to draw! It was amazing to see this incredible site (and check it off my bucket list), but it was so frustrating to have so little time to sketch and absorb this ancient, historic place.
In the post, I described my dilemma, showed my unpainted drawing, and asked folks, would you add paint to this sketch later to “finish” it or leave it as it is? I have to say that I was surprised at how many people said to “go ahead and paint it,” “there are no rules in art”, etc. Some suggested that if I add more later, off site, I can post it, just not to Urban Sketchers or USk (as a rule, both only show sketches done on location.) Others suggested drawing a second version and painting that, but doesn’t that change the essence and intent of an urban sketch?
I have always preferred to draw AND paint on location, but I have known for a while that some urban sketchers draw on site and paint later, I just always assumed it wasn’t very many people. For me, working on site, in the moment, on the spot, infuses a certain energy and spontaneity into the sketch that is nearly impossible to duplicate later in the controlled comfort of a studio. I feel that working a sketch later changes it’s purpose, from capturing an experience to creating a perfect piece of art…nothing at all wrong with that and we certainly want our sketches to look nice, but I’ve realized that capturing the experience is more important to me personally. Sure, it would probably look better if I painted it later as it’s really difficult to paint on location, but I feel a deep sense of accomplishment when I finish a sketch on site. My sketches are something of a visual diary, a record of my adventures…it’s why I don’t sell them.
In writing my last book, THE WORLD OF URBAN SKETCHING, I spent LOTS of time sorting through LOTS of artists to find ones that were true location sketchers. There are countless fabulous sketch artists out there all over Instagram, but you have to dig deep sometimes to see if they are really working on location or in a studio. It can be hard to tell the difference, especially if they are studio painters who erroneously post to USk official sites. I would write to some artists and ask if they work on location, and if they said no, then they didn’t make it into the book. It’s also why I tried to show photos of sketches on location, with the context in the background–to really show it is a true urban sketch! I was documenting the world of Urban Sketching after all!
If working on location is at the core of what Urban Sketchers is about, born from reportage sketching, should we draw and paint on location? If I only had 15 minutes and no time to paint, isn’t the unpainted sketch saying something about the experience? Or would it be better if I add color and had a nicer looking image in my sketchbook? I suspect the answer is based on why each of us sketches.
This is something that urban sketchers rarely, if ever, discuss, but I’m curious what others do and what they think about this issue. So, what do you think? Is drawing on site and painting later OK? What’s more important to you, the work of art or the experience? What should an urban sketch be?
And should I add paint or leave it as it is?????



























